Mike

Understand the mechanics of how the transmitter works which surprises me
considering your usual good understanding of the subjects you comment on,
the quoted output at 70 watts is peak power, not average. The average based
on a 112us message, which has about 50% only containing either a .5 or 1us
pulse, averages out at only a few watts. Boeing have conducted tests on EMR
from these devices and concluded that after a distance of 2 inches no
appreciable levels are of any concern.

You can obtain a free space calculator for calculating losses from a
transmitted antenna off the net, you will need to convert watts to Dbm.

My company was the one who got up at the ABIT meeting and proposed the lower
output power so I have the information first hand. The Boeing data was
supplied by Boeing, who were also at the meeting. So was Bob Hall, albeit
uninformed and a wasted his time as he had done no preparation or research
into ADS-B, although I think he now has a better understanding of what is
going on, he also had a look at our handheld ADS-B unit, which runs on 4 AA
batteries for 4 to 5 hours - sort of discounted his belief that to power
ADS-B you needed a small nuclear reactor.

Remember Mike I am at the coalface, so to speak so working on Pulse L band
transmitter design is what I do daily.

Cheers

Nigel  

  

Nigel Andrews

Managing Director

RF Developments Pty Ltd

"A Queensland Company devoted to Research and Development in aviation
electronics" 

Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Web www.rf-developments.com

Ph: (61) 7 54635670 Fax: (61) 7 54635695

**************DISCLAIMER************

The information contained in the above e-mail message or messages (which
includes any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. It
is intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed. If you are not the addressee any form of disclosure, copying,
modification, distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on the
information is unauthorised. If you received this communication in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your computer system
network. 



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Borgelt
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 11:09 AM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring inAustralia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] 200 feet separation


Take a look at this:

http://astra.aero/ABIT/index.aspx


ADSB implementation stuff. Note the mid air collision paper.

Also one other paper does discuss the possible concerns about the effect of
high power rf pulses on the pilots of composite aircraft. The proposal is
that they will halve this for GA aircraft below 15000 feet and the pulses at
the antenna will only be 70 watts. Oh joy!

Mike


Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments phone
Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
          Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to