I'd rather pay a grand now for a commercially-manufactured FLARM which will
have marginal but increasingly important benefits as take-up increases, and
trust that the commercially astute manufacturer will give me software
upgrades when experience allows us to tweak the algorithms for even better
reliability.  Seems to me that so long as it's a good direction to be going
in, we should move in that direction, even if we know there will be further
improvements along the way (oops, isn't that just about a definition for
continuous improvement?).

As long as the foundations put in place at the start ( That is where we are right now & why this is being discussed ) do not preclude the process of continuous improvement. VHF AM comms...

Don
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to