Stuart,

I was not having a go at you and understand how you meant it. I wanted to simply clarify that there is no reason for the RA-Aus to misdirect the media by saying the aircraft belongs to another org, as I felt that your paragraph could have been interpreted that way.

 

Chris

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart & Kerri FERGUSON
Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2005 7:45 PM
To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.'
Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] NOT a glider -was a drifter fatal at Byron

 

Chris,

           Not what I said at all – please re-read my comments; as you know I am also a member of the RAA.

 

SDF 

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of fibremites
Sent: Saturday, 22 October 2005 9:30 PM
To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.'
Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] NOT a glider -was a drifter fatal at Byron

 

 

 

In this case is it the GFA or the local gliding clubs place

to make a media release? I don’t think so. In this case it the responsibility belongs to the RAA

and or the local police, and we have not control over how they manage the media.

 

This does not imply that RA-Aus is managing the media by reporting the accident as a glider.

A sad day indeed.

 

Chris Kiehn

RA-Aus

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to