Perhaps they are not mistakes as such, at least not in a way that
answering 2+2 = 5 is. It just could be that given a particular set of
(generally stressful) circumstances repeated often enough, an incorrect
response will be produced. Maybe that some individuals are susceptible
more then others and the problem may be in identifying how to overcome
the fallibility rather then simply identifying the cause, such as keep
safe flying speed in the circuit.
Paul
Mark Newton wrote:
Wayne Carter wrote:
Thanks Mark, the information below is (morbidly) fascinating. Do you
have a link to the RISKs site for direct updates?
Various info is enclosed here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISKS_Digest
Official home page is here:
http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/risks
(including an archive, which makes pretty depressing reading when you
go through enough of it to notice patterns of failure which persist
to this day. We really haven't found any new ways of killing ourselves,
and nor have we learned any real lessons. We just keep making the
same dumb mistakes over and over and over again...)
- mark
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I tried an internal modem, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but it hurt when I walked. Mark Newton
----- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 ------------- Fax: +61-8-82231777 -----
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
