If anyone is interested.

http://www.liquidcooledairpower.com/cj-overview.shtml



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
nandrews
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2007 8:00 AM
To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.'
Subject: [Aus-soaring] cool jugs

Ian,

I think they are being marketed as COOL JUGS, as at Oshkosh a few years
ago
one of the salesman had a teeshirt with "nice set of jugs" in text on it
and
showing a set of the cooling jackets or "JUGS" over a cylinder.

Trust the Yanks to come up with a product name like that, like the
restaurant nearby which was HOOTERS and it had nothing to do with horns
on
cars.

Cheers

Nig


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian
McPhee
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2007 7:31 AM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Re: Aus-soaring Digest, Vol 43, Issue 24

Personally I think a simple way to go would be "cool heads"  added to 
Lycoming and just have the water cooling system to add to aircraft.
THere 
is a lot of work to reengine a plane trust me and if you eventually get 
there you must always keep a close look for cracks in engine mounts and 
exhaust.   Ian M
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wayne Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 1:16 PM
Subject: [Aus-soaring] Re: Aus-soaring Digest, Vol 43, Issue 24


> Gotta be liquid cooled, Anthony, or we are still in the dark ages.
> Its not just the thermal shock imposed on tug engines specifically
that 
> favours jacketed engines, the internal tolerances can be sharpened 
> considerably due to the limited temperature changes, improving power, 
> emissions, wear and overall reliablilty. Noise output also goes down, 
> cleaning is simpler although there is an argument for reliabililty due
to 
> coolant system failure (more bits, basically)
> I am not currently up to speed, however a few years back (8-10) both 
> Cummins and GM / Detroit heavy motors stated their #1 engine failure
cause

> was coolant system fault. Current engine managments systems can get
you 
> home / safe with a full coolant system loss, albeit at a significantly

> reduced power output.
> I do like the 3000 hour bit though....
> Wayne Carter
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.4.0/762 - Release Date:
4/15/2007 
> 4:22 PM
>
> 
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to