I may be mistaken, but I thought the 2300hr trace was UTC time, which fits
with it being published at about 9.30 here in SA.

-Matthew
On Sep 17, 2011 8:10 AM, "Robert Hart" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 16/09/11 21:13, [email protected] wrote:
>> Thanks Mark,
>> Like Peter T, I am using IE as my browser, Yeah, the error message
>> mentioned Apache.
>> Now working just fine.
>> You must have re-tickled the program in just in the right spot: Thank
>> goodness! I was not looking forward to brushing up on using Skew-T
>> data off the University of Wyoming site.
>>
> Gary
>
> The SkewT/LogP is a bit complicated until you get used to it. I have
> attempted to explain how to use it in the following article.
>
>
>
http://the-white-knight-speaks.blogspot.com/2009/10/understanding-and-using-atmospheric.html
>
> If you have a read of that and still are having difficulty, I'd be happy
> to talk you through using it.
>
> The really big advantage of using the SkewT/LogP diagram is that this is
> what NOAA puts out - which forecasts what the atmosphere will be doing
> during the day. One of the inputs into its forecasting model NOAA use is
> the data from Australian temp traces.
>
> Whilst looking at the actual temp traces is certainly useful, looking in
> the morning here in Aus means that you are looking at the 2300hrs trace
> from yesterday - and furthermore there are large areas of Australia that
> are nowhere near a site that does temp traces with balloons.
>
> We've been using the NOAA forecasting tools now for quite a few years
> at DDSC and, whilst there are limitations (principally close to trough
> lines here in Qld), once you get used to these NOAA's SkewT/LogP is an
> exceptionally useful tool.
>
> --
> Robert Hart [email protected]
> +61 (0)438 385 533 http://www.hart.wattle.id.au
>
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to