Official Observers, please, when you help someone with their badge or record
attempt, your primary role is to make sure that the claim, sent to Beryl for
badges, and to me for records, is complete. Check through the log file, look
for obvious problems, sort them out and put in with the claim all the
evidence required. If you are not sure about something, it is often batter
to email me or Beryl, send the log file, ask the questions, and then prepare
the claim, rather than sending a deficient claim, and having it sent back to
you.

>> 

For Records, the claim envelop will contain at least the following: claim
form(s), completed & signed by Observer and pilot, a copy of the original
log file, a barograph calibration (I might not always require this),
measuring certificate, and a Narrative by the OO.

The OO Narrative will address issues such as:

(1)          That the OO observed the pilot(s), glider, and Flight
Recorder(s) in the glider either at take-off or landing. 

(2)          That the OO downloaded, or observed the download, of the log
file and kept an original copy. 

(3)          That all FRs in the glider were downloaded, to check the
declarations. 

(4)          Any other issues, such as evidence regarding airspace
penetration : was the airspace inactive? Is there a copy of a notam? Have
you asked the pilot about it? Did they get a clearance from ATC? Is there
some local airspace agreement?

Why are these things important?

(1)          Probably the single most important duty of the OO is to ensure
that the FR from which the log file is taken, was carried by that pilot in
that glider. No substitution has taken place.

(2)          An original log file is essential, because log files that have
been modified in any way will fail the 'data verification' which I must
perform when checking record claims. Send it to me on the same evening after
the flight, and if there is a problem, you have the opportunity to download
the FR again before the next flight, using different software for example.
If a log file has been sent to OLC, it will often fail verification. It gets
modified, extra lines of data get added. It is no longer the original log
file.

(3)          This is to prevent cheating, where two tasks are declared, and
the pilot decides which one to fly after taking off. The last declaration
made before take-off is the valid one. If there are two declarations, an
assessment must be made as to the significance of this.

(4)          Obviously, your flight must be legal.

When I am asked to Observe a flight, I make a note of the serial number of
the FR before the pilot takes off. That doesn't take long. After the flight,
I have plenty of time to sit down with the pilot and go through all the
evidence.

If you have done the flight and landed, but did not have an OO available
before take-off, DO NOT remove the FR from the glider. The evidence for your
take-off and landing in the glider can be taken from the daily flight log
kept at the pie cart, but if you have removed the FR, the OO can no longer
certify it was in the glider. It is always best to have the OO there at
take-off, because if you land out, and get retrieved, and then offer the FR
to the OO the next morning, the OO is again not in a position to certify the
relevant actions.

>> 

Pam Kurstjens

Records Officer, Data Analyst, GFA

 

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to