Depends on the glider and airfoil if the flap position is critical.

On the LS6 the flaps hardly work! Hence the LS8. It only took them 10 years to figure this out but they had the DLR polar test (including flap settings) for the LS6 back in 1984 showing this.

Flying smoothly has many benefits - you are less likely to make yourself sick, the path flown through the air is shorter and your variometer is likely to work better. Lower G loads mean the G induced transients in the Total Energy line are lower and the vario is esier to interpret. It is difficult enough to do this with the effects of horizontal gusts. Fortunately that is about to end (the sensitivity to horizontal gusts). Dynamis is *very* smooth as in the real world vertical air motions aren't usually completely sharp edged.

Flying through the best air and avoiding the worst is the aim in cruise. Removing the effects of horizontal gust will make this much easier for even small values of airmass vertical motion.

As flying through the best AIR (not necessarily the lowest glider sink rate - it varies as you change airspeed) is what you need to do, those who aren't using netto or relative netto to remove the effects of varying glider sink rates with speed are operating with a self imposed handicap. See the article on Basic glider instruments on our website for a detailed explanation.

Drag rakes have never been all that popular because of a couple if issues with getting them to work properly. I think my design fixes that.

Mike

 .







At 06:48 PM 3/04/2014, you wrote:
Adam and others
It must be 30 years ago Brad Edwards wanted to try one out when he was owner IIC ASW20. We made up a very low speed airspeed indicator out of a vario and calibrated it. Brad flew a season with it. The discovery he made was to always fly smoothly and never ever do sudden pull ups with G as this really added to drag. He already knew but you had to use flaps correctly - slightly wrong then huge drag. He never fitted it again next season and maybe he then got ASW20B I can not remember. It would be worth phoning Brad (H 0267 711733) if you want to know more.

After learning from the drag rake he certainly flew very well. Actually the best way to learn is fly with him and see how smoothly he flys.

Not to do with drag rake but Brad really searches out good air and goes out of the way to avoid heavy sink.

Ian McPhee


On 3 April 2014 17:45, Adam Woolley <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
G'day all,

An odd question to throw out to the group, does anyone have a drag rake instrument that they'd be willing to lend out? I'm keen to do some flight data testing on my Ventus 1.

Particularly to determine optimum flap settings* for differing wingloadings, but also perhaps to experiment with turbulator chord positions and thickness.

*the flight manual & Dick Johnson FTR's show differently, as I'm sure Idaflieg would too!


Cheers,
WPP
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
<http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring>http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784     overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784                :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia  
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to