Noel, Where did I say "zero liability"? I didn't. Nor did I say AusNOG had any liability. That is not my call as an individual who is ALSO not a member of the AusNOG board nor a judge, nor a lawyer. Are you a judge who can assert liability?
What I said was that the "issue" occurred at someplace other than an AusNOG event. This IS a situation that individuals and companies in the industry need to take a hard look at themselves. T. > On 12 Apr 2022, at 1:23 pm, Noel Butler <[email protected]> wrote: > > I might have trimmed too much of the already over quoting so my bad, I have > zero interest in who was involved or what. > > the "Fact" was it appeared Terry was claiming ausnog have zero liability in > it, that is what i was referring to asking for the precedent case :) > > cheers > > > > On 12/04/2022 13:13, Nathan Brookfield wrote: > >> It may well be 'fact' and it's not my place at this stage to elaborate to >> the remainder of the community but considering the 'Offender' and the >> 'Victim' in this particular case were both at -- > Regards, > Noel Butler > > This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged > information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to > copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate this > message without the authors express written authority to do so. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete all copies > of this message including attachments immediately. Confidentiality, > copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of the > mistaken delivery of this message. > > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
