Unless I have massively misunderstood, we're talking about P95 for CVC charges, not for end user billing.
On Sunday, 30 July 2017, Mark Delany <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29Jul17, Matthew Moyle-Croft allegedly wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm going to side step that entirely > > ... > > > I did have some interesting responses - I think it's pretty clear > > though that a p95 product for CVC would be popular and unlock a lot > > of options for ISPs. > > I can see why this is appealing from an RSP perspective. P95 is > definitely comfort food for RSPs and it's traditionally easy to > measure. > > But. The NBN is a consumer-centric network and p95 borders on > obfuscation as far as consumers are concerned. Certainly up there with > AGC+CVC. > > Given that the NBN is funded by consumers (aka tax payers) I think it > behooves our industry to create a transparent and easy-to-understand > costing model for those paying the bills. And, p95 aint it. > > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
