“It sounds like `Low latency’ isn’t as important to you as you initially led me to believe…” :-)
- mark > On Dec 18, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Cameron Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > > That was a question I posed however the response was 70 application users > here vs 600 there. > > On 18 Dec. 2017 3:19 pm, "Mark Newton" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Have they considered relocating the application? > > I don’t think you’ll find a low latency path between those two countries, so > if the application is latency-sensitive it’s always going to suck. > > But you might find two best-available paths between each country and a > workable midpoint which could lower your application latency by something > approaching a factor of 2. > > - mark > > > > On Dec 18, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Cameron Murray <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Guys, > > > > I've been asked to entertain the idea of a customer of ours needing a > > dedicated link between their Australian branches and their head office in > > ZA. > > > > They use a Latency sensitive application which is what they are trying to > > improve by this request. Is there any providers that office links from WA > > > ZA ? Currently latency ranges between 450 - 550ms from their WAN gateway in > > Brisbane however if there was an option to terminate a link to their Perth > > office we would take that path. > > > > TIA > > > > Cameron > > _______________________________________________ > > AusNOG mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > > <http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog> >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
