I'm sure nothing could go wrong there... A
On 14 August 2018 at 14:11, Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > A quick reading of the exposure bill would allow for a scenario like this: > > Force a developer to modify the app to send a encrypted copy of the > traffic to > a given address and to issue a new version triggering a “update available” > notification. > > Force the store to return the modified version of the app to specific > accounts. > Both versions of the application are signed etc. > > Note this does NOT disable encryption. Both the developer and the store > fall > under 6 of Designated communications provider and eligible activities. > > Alternatively just update the app so that traffic to specific > accounts/numbers is > mirrored. > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
