Not for profits still rely on a revenue stream. Time will tell. Kind regards
Paul Wilkins On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 17:28, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, Paul Wilkins wrote: > > > 1 - I take a dim view of the implied bad faith. You need to have a > > think about the implications of what you're saying before posting in a > > public space. > > Perhaps you are not familiar with Mark's comments on similar issues in the > past? > > > 2 - Per the ordinary conventions of debate, contradiction is not an > > argument. If you believe a statement to be in error, there is an onus > > to offer evidence. I on the other hand, have posted extensively on this > > thread, and quoted the relevant legislation. > > You have not, however, replied to me when I made the same point about > Signal and Telegram that Mark did. I'll cop to not having read the > exposure draft of the bill (it's not legislation yet thankfully) but I've > had other things to do with my time. Also the debate is not just on the > text of the bill, but also the stated reasons for governments wanting such > power vs the practicalities and actual uses it would see. > > -- > # TRS-80 trs80(a)ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au #/ "Otherwise Bub here > will do \ > # UCC Wheel Member http://trs80.ucc.asn.au/ #| what squirrels do > best | > [ "There's nobody getting rich writing ]| -- Collect and hide > your | > [ software that I know of" -- Bill Gates, 1980 ]\ nuts." -- Acid Reflux > #231 /
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
