1 - Denials by Apple & Amazon are qualified 2 - Bloomberg are a reputable news agency 3 - They quote multiple sources 4 - They quote 30 approx companies affected 5 - This is a feasible vector, which means it's a risk
Kind regards Paul Wilkins On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 15:05, Matthew Moyle-Croft <m...@mmc.com.au> wrote: > Fairly robust rebuttal from the usually very silent Amazon. > > > https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/setting-the-record-straight-on-bloomberg-businessweeks-erroneous-article/ > > MMC > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 2:18 PM Rob Thomas <xro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Odd. I've messaged the mods, I had a bit.ly link in it, which may have >> triggered the spamfilter. >> >> I've pastebin'ed the text here -- https://pastebin.com/mVpqNa38 >> >> --Rob >> >> >> On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 14:43, Bill Woodcock <wo...@pch.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> > On Oct 4, 2018, at 9:39 PM, Rob Thomas <xro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > I posed to /r/netsec if anyone cares to take the discussion there >>> >>> Posted seven minutes ago, and already removed? >>> >>> -Bill >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >> > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
