Compare: CHAIR: So the big companies like Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, over-the-top messaging services like Signal and WhatsApp? Mr Hansford: A range of different industry companies. CHAIR: *A good percentage of those?* Mr Hansford: *A reasonable percentage, I'd say.* (Public) FRIDAY, 19 OCTOBER 2018
"The government has consulted *extensively* with industry and the public on these measuresand has made amendments to reflect the feedback in the legislation now before the parliament." Minister for Home Affairs - Speech to Parliament 20 Sept 2018 On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 16:01, Paul Wilkins <[email protected]> wrote: > DIGI's submission (Amazon, Facebook, Google, Oath, and Twitter) has just > appeared: > > > https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=d48c3c35-221d-4544-a7d7-109a82c72dc1&subId=661549 > > On August 14, 2018, the Government released for Public Exposure a draft of > the Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and > Access) Bill 2018 (the “Bill”) together with an Exposure Document, to which > DIGI made a submission (attached). A revised Bill was introduced to > Parliament ten days following the close of submissions, with only minor > amendments that fail to address its potential impacts on public safety, > cybersecurity, privacy and human rights, raising concern among industry, > consumer and civil society groups. > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 11:30, Paul Wilkins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The PJCHR express extensive concerns with the bill. >> >> >> https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Committees/Senate/committee/humanrights_ctte/reports/2018/Report%2011/c01.pdf?la=en >> >> The following demonstrates a posture where they will likely oppose the >> bill without further safeguards: >> >> 1.109 Another relevant factor in assessing whether a measure is >> proportionate is whether there is the possibility of oversight and the >> availability of review. The power to give a technical assistance notice or >> request, or technical capability notice, is not exercised by a judge, nor >> does a judge supervise its application. Section 317ZFA provides a >> discretionary power to a court, in relation to proceedings before it, to >> make such orders as the court considers appropriate in relation to the >> disclosure, protection, storage, handling or destruction of technical >> assistance information, if the court is satisfied that it is in the public >> interest. The bill does not otherwise provide for court involvement in the >> process of giving a technical assistance notice or request, or technical >> capability notice. The bill additionally seeks to amend the Administrative >> Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (ADJR Act) to exclude decisions under >> Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act (which would include a decision to >> issue a technical assistance notice or request, or technical capability >> notice) from judicial review under the ADJR Act. 47 In these circumstances, >> further information from the minister as the adequacy of the safeguards in >> terms of oversight and review would assist in determining the >> proportionality of the measures. >> >> Kind regards >> Paul Wilkins >> >> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 15:12, Paul Wilkins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> 21 October AEC had received 6890 postal votes out of 12,788 issued. >>> Today, received postal votes is 7,789. Sharma is trailing by 1,552. So I'm >>> calling it a Phelps' win and we will have minority government. >>> >>> Phelps will win by at least 500 votes so no recount. >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Paul Wilkins >>> >>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 18:19, Paul Wilkins <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Transcript of public hearing 19th October: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22committees%2Fcommjnt%2F2a1771c8-f314-43f2-b9b0-cd09ad8123ae%2F0000%22 >>>> >>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 16:46, Christian Heinrich < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Paul, >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:12 PM Paul Wilkins <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > Except that where subject to an order under 317j to conceal the >>>>> existence of a TCN/TAN forms part of the terms. >>>>> >>>>> For PCI-DSS Requirement 4 Telstra [as an example I don't recommend] >>>>> have mandated that their customer is responsible for both the >>>>> infrastructure and software [as a service] within >>>>> >>>>> https://www.telstra.com.au/content/dam/tcom/personal/consumer-advice/pdf/business-a-full/cloud-h.pdf >>>>> and are therefore unable to assist with the implementation of the >>>>> TCN/TAN. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Christian Heinrich >>>>> >>>>> http://cmlh.id.au/contact >>>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
