Dutton's argument is premised on a false equivalence. It's perfectly possible to protect against terrorism without throwing out the baby with the bathwater, kicking doors in on data centres and warrantless mass surveillance.
Kind regards Paul Wilkins On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 15:25, Christian Heinrich < [email protected]> wrote: > James, > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 12:43, James Andrewartha <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/nov/14/labor-accuses-peter-dutton-of-lying-to-politicise-national-security > > Worth nothing that there is still no evidence that WhatsApp was used > during the "Bourke Street attack was “unsophisticated”, consisting of > an offender who had taken “a kitchen knife and thrown a couple of gas > bottles on to the back of the ute”. > > > -- > Regards, > Christian Heinrich > > http://cmlh.id.au/contact > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
