Halon was banned at the same time as CFCs in aerosols and refrigerants because it's an Ozone depleting gas. There should not be any Halon datacentres anywhere in Australia. Probably not anywhere in the world, tbqh.

Aviation is an exempt use, which is why you saw it on your C-17. You can buy fixed or portable halon systems intended for deployment in aircraft even today (for example: https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pspages/h3rhalon.php?clickkey=11303 -- one of the few few ways you can acquire ozone depleting gasses as a retail customer in 2018!)

CO2 is a hazardous gas, and should be pretty rare for fire suppression. Possible that there are still some small and/or ancient systems out there, but risk assessment under OHS&W legislation ought to have seen them all replaced by now.

Datacentres in Australia will be using FM-200 or Inergen. FM-200 can be stored in compressed gas or liquid; obviously liquid means the storage takes up significantly less volume. FM-200 has fallen out of favor during the last five years because it's a greenhouse gas, which makes me regret not having a crystal ball when I was putting it in datacentres ten years ago :-)

Both of them are engineered solutions which take the room volume into account. The goal is to add enough gas to the room to drop the oxygen content from 19% to something in the 15%-17% range, which is low enough to extinguish most fire but high enough to sustain human life. If you're in the room when it goes off you'll end up uncomfortably short of breath (and probably very cold!), but you shouldn't suffocate if the system has been designed properly.

A complete system will generally also include a pre-action dry pipe deluge sprinkler system which can trigger if the gas fails to extinguish the fire.

... and a good insurance policy. If any of these systems go off, might end up with system loss and/or data loss. Hard disks don't like rapid pressure changes or large quantities of water, so all bets are off once the VESDA trips out.

  - mark



On 12/13/2018 01:13 PM, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
I remember walking onboard a C-17 Globemaster a year or two ago at Amberley, still had Halon installed with proper masks sitting next to the buttons. Probably one of those "exempt" / "critical" use cases I'm sure being military...

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:10 PM Adam Gibson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    FM200 is still used in a few DC’s in Sydney and Brisbane to my
    knowledge. But is costly to replace due to environmental charges.

    In Polaris we check all our bottles in accordance to the fire
    program (which was approved upon completion with the fire code of
    that time) which is every year, bottles are check and every month,
    fire tech comes out to inspect gauges release valves and all
    control boards. All bottles are to be replaced every 10 years of
    less and  Co2 bottles to replaced every 3 years.

    In my opinion, fire is something that is neglected a lot in DC’s.

    AG

    Adam Gibson

    *Head of Data Centres*

    Springfield City Group

    t: +61 7 3819 9999

    f: +61 7 3819 9900

    m: +61 4 00 807 822

    e:mailto:[email protected]

    *From:*AusNOG <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> *On Behalf Of *Bruce Forster
    *Sent:* Thursday, 13 December 2018 10:36 AM
    *To:* [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] [AUSNog] : Re Data Centre Fire Suppression
    Safety

    Pretty sure halon is banned, but fm200 is the gas used these days?

    https://www.safelife.az/en/index.php/services/firefighting-by-gas.html

    Firstly, the most important advantage of the use of chemical gas -
    it is safe for people and electronic equipment. During fire
    fighting gas is used in a concentration not to be harmful to human
    health and life. When using the FM200 gas concentration of oxygen
    in the room is reduced by 3%. Along with the fact that such a
    composition of the air is not sufficient to continue the fire, it
    allows people who are there to breathe.

    On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:01 AM Chris Ford
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        As a university cadet working for IBM in the late 80s I
        remember getting inducted into the Westpac data centres and
        getting a long explanation of what to do when the halon system
        went off – where the breathing gear was, where the exits were,
        to basically just drop everything and run.

        Have been inducted into a few DCs in the last 3 years and
        can’t remember that being part of the induction at all –
        although given I already knew it I may have just glossed over
        that part.

        --

        Chris Ford

        Chief Technology Officer

        *INABOX GROUP*

        *m***0401 988 844 *e***[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>

        *t***02 8275 6871 *w***www.inaboxgroup.com.au
        <http://www.inaboxgroup.com.au>

        *From:*AusNOG <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> *On Behalf Of *Paul
        Wilkins
        *Sent:* Thursday, 13 December 2018 10:53 AM
        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* [AusNOG] [AUSNog] : Re Data Centre Fire Suppression
        Safety

        Every data centre has a fire suppression system. We're not
        used to thinking of this as a hazardous environment, but
        consequent to two techs being found dead working on a fire
        suppression system in Antarctica
        
<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/12/antarctica-two-technicians-dead-mcmurdo-station-ross-island>,
        I find myself wondering yet again, why there aren't more
        stringent controls around the fire suppression systems in data
        centres: viz - when you enter a data centre, how confident can
        you be you're not going to be quietly asphyxiated?

        Kind regards

        Paul Wilkins

        _______________________________________________
        AusNOG mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog


--
    Regards,

    Bruce

    _______________________________________________
    AusNOG mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog



_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

Reply via email to