On 5 Feb 2019, at 2:45 pm, Ian Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:

> two separate emulation 'sessions' at once). Anybody got any other
> suggestions/products that have worked well? Doesn't need to be super
> hardcore, it'll definitely be FOSS based.

Hi folks,

Got some great responses on and off list, thanks all. Ended up buying a Qotom 
Q555G6 for about $600 AUD off Aliexpress - 7th gen Core i5 2.6Ghz, 8G RAM, 64G 
M2, Wifi, 6x Intel I211 NICs. The build quality is great, the box is small 
enough to fit in my backpack, its fanless but doesn’t run very hot, its all in 
one - only needs the box and a power brick compared to a pi with a bunch of 
different dongles. My only quality concern is the power supply, but worst case 
its a 12V 5amp DC barrel connector, can just replace it from Jaycar.

"Doesn’t need to be super hardcore” got thrown out the window - the machine is 
far more grunty than the original requirement called for, but I really 
appreciate the flexibility of an entire Linux machine I can do effectively any 
tomfoolery with. Its even got enough steam to run a few simple VMs, I could run 
up some simple GNS3 topologies. 

I tested throughput by creating three bridges of two NICs each and cabling them 
together in a chain, then using iperf on external machines averaging about 
940Mbit (so aggregate of about 5Gbit bidirectional). With NIC offload disabled 
the CPU was still doing absolutely nothing. 

> While I'm on the topic, is wanem still the best choice for
> throughput/latency/jitter/loss/etc simulation?

Decided against using wanem. While its a wonderfully simple setup, I didn’t 
like using a live CD image. I’ve installed Ubuntu 18.10 and will just use tc 
controlled by the usual handful of bash scripts.

Rgds,



- I.
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

Reply via email to