suggest you work with The National Security Hotline (NSH) 1800 123 400. I think that might be a better direction for your msg.
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 20:15, Chris Macko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > You do realise how easy it is to get ammonium nitrate in WA goldfields and > even easier on Australian Opal fields? Not even requirements for cctv from > governance bodies for storage locations so completely lack of regard for > explosives security in that area exposed. > > Matey pull your finger maybe the little pinky and start taking this > seriously. I’d hate for our stock market to take a crash just because China > wanted a bit of backlash against us and America and found a gap within our > technology layer on this front. > > Now wouldn’t that be an easy way to take control of our country? Forget > about weapons of mass destruction one risk toppling all corporations in one > foul swoop. > > No words from ASX lads? Or don’t they tune in to tech related network > operators groups. Beware I’m sure that our Chinese friends are making calls > right this instant as a result of these troubling factors. > > Christopher-Edward Macko > > On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 9:21 am, Mark Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 5 Sep 2019, at 11:55 PM, Chris Macko <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Examples of this include TIA942 and the Uptime Institute specs >> requiring bullet proof glass yet no one has a procedure to stop 1kg let >> alone 100kg of servers filled with explosives from entering our data >> centres disguised as normal server equipment within fully racks brought in >> by clients during colo moves. >> >> That’s a bit of a movie-plot threat, though. >> >> If an adversary has reached the point where that’s a sensible tack for >> them to take, I’m going to offer that nothing your company does is going to >> be capable of stopping them because your imagination is unlikely to be as >> good as theirs, and we’re well into the realm of heavy law enforcement or >> light military response. >> >> I expect that most of this community’s denizens will find that they’re >> protected from this (supposed) threat by being in multiple locations in any >> case. Unless you’re going to up the movie plot stakes by saying the >> adversary is in all of them at the same time. >> >> (Can I also point out that the threat posed by smuggled explosives is >> indistinguishable from the threat posed by earthquake, flood, or fire, and >> companies with business continuity plans capable of withstanding completely >> predictable natural disasters have no need to invest additional stress into >> dealing with the next Die Hard sequel? You’re either prepared or you >> aren’t; And everyone already knows how to prepare, they just differ in how >> much they want to spend doing it) >> >> - mark >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
