>> "if performance matters (and it does very much so), why would you be using *_anything_* virtualised at all..."
Because it's not actually possible to write meaningful SLAs for time multiplexed services. At the end of the day I agree with Brad, if you need a performant system you want resident hardware. Kind regards Paul Wilkins On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 21:20, Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> wrote: > if performance matters (and it does very much so), why would you be using > *_anything_* virtualised at all... > > > On 03/10/2019 23:19, Guy Ellis wrote: > > Has anyone bothered to evaluate TNSR which I will think replace pfsense > where performance really matters? > > -- > > Kind Regards, > > Noel Butler > This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged > information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright > protected under international law. You may not disseminate, discuss, or > reveal, any part, to anyone, without the authors express written authority > to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender > then delete all copies of this message including attachments, immediately. > Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost by > reason of the mistaken delivery of this message. Only PDF > <http://www.adobe.com/> and ODF > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument> documents accepted, please do > not send proprietary formatted documents > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog