The problem statement is that v4 adds "cost and complexity to network infrastructure and raise significant technical and economic barriers to innovation".
And the "only viable option to ensure future growth and innovation in Internet technology and services" is a transition to v6 only. Not sure I can support that argument. Maybe that innovation we're missing out on is one of those "unknown unknowns". -JB On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 12:55, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In light of Telstra's single stack deployment, this might be of interest. >> Regards >> >> Michael Biber >> 0412058808 >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Latif LADID (IPv6-based New Internet) <[email protected]> >> >> >> *USG Call for Comment for IPv6-Only Deployment* >> >> >> >> >> *Completing the Transition to IPv6 ONLY* >> >> >> "https://www.cio.gov/assets/resources/internet-protocol-version6-draft.pdf"; >> <https://www.cio.gov/assets/resources/internet-protocol-version6-draft.pdf> >> >> > >> *Courtesy: Carol Bales, EOP/OMB; Ron Bewtra (JMD); Douglas Montgomery >> (NIST)* >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ap-ipv6tf mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ap-ipv6tf >> > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
