Forgot to link WinMTR for you: https://sourceforge.net/projects/winmtr/
Kindly, ROY ADAMS* | *P 07 3040 5010 | Web: http://www.racs.com.au/ | Wiki: https://ex.racs.com.au:444/ | eMail: mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> A positive attitude causes a chain reaction of positive thoughts, events, and outcomes. If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur - Red Adair. Life is a journey through a series of adventures... Live them, love them, hate them, but never give up on your dreams, desires, and goals. Have you been good today? ಠ_ಠ On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 16:58, Roy Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Giles, > > Using ICMP traces to measure traffic loss is fraught with danger due to > intermediate routers dropping unimportant traffic like ICMP. > Drawing conclusions regarding packet loss also requires noting the same or > higher degree of packet loss further down the trace, among many other > factors (see further below) > A double end trace (one initiated form each end) is required from > 124.19.69.102 to 27.32.160.196, and also from 27.32.160.196 to > 124.19.69.102. > This could well show that the trace in each direction follows a different > path - i.e. asymmetric routing. > mtr / WinMTR is a more reliable tool to do the above - you will need mtr > profiles from each end to start painting a better picture. > > Some light reading on understanding traceroutes in general, well worth the > read: > > http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Sunday/RAS_Traceroute_N47_Sun.pdf > > I hope the above is of use. > Here in the Philippines, we have learned some hard lessons about making > assumptions about traffic loss. > > Kindly, > > ROY ADAMS* | *P 07 3040 5010 | Web: http://www.racs.com.au/ | Wiki: > https://ex.racs.com.au:444/ | eMail: mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]> > A positive attitude causes a chain reaction of positive thoughts, events, > and outcomes. > If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait > until you hire an amateur - Red Adair. > Life is a journey through a series of adventures... Live them, love them, > hate them, but never give up on your dreams, desires, and goals. > Have you been good today? ಠ_ಠ > > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 16:42, Giles Pollock <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not sure if anyone else is enjoying this experience, but I've seen a few >> occasions where there seems to be degradation between TPG and Vocus in >> Victoria. Pings go up by between 50-100ms with about 15% packet loss along >> the way. >> >> 4 5 ms 6 ms 5 ms 10.20.22.139 >> 5 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 27-32-160-196.static.tpgi.com.au >> [27.32.160.196] >> 6 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 203-219-107-206.static.tpgi.com.au >> [203.219.107.206] >> 7 69 ms 67 ms 69 ms 203.8.177.110 >> 8 * * * Request timed out. >> 9 * * * Request timed out. >> 10 68 ms 68 ms 68 ms 124.19.61.93 >> 11 73 ms 72 ms 72 ms 124.19.69.102 >> >> >> Seen it come and go a few times over the last few weeks too. Makes >> working from home a bit of a pain when remote sessions keep getting punted >> out due to the packet loss! >> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >> >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
