On 4/11/21 4:17 PM, shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
conforming applications can not rely on unspecified behaviors, so having a
use beyond that specified makes the shell nonconforming. Calling it out
like that simply acknowledges a lot of shell implementations choose to make
themselves nonconforming, I do not see it as an endorsement or allowance.
This is just wrong. By this definition, every shell is non-conforming.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
