The following issue has a resolution that has been APPLIED. 
====================================================================== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=696 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                philip-guenther
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1
Issue ID:                   696
Category:                   Base Definitions and Headers
Type:                       Clarification Requested
Severity:                   Objection
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     Applied
Name:                       Philip Guenther 
Organization:               OpenBSD 
User Reference:              
Section:                    <limits.h> 
Page Number:                273 
Line Number:                8986-8990 
Interp Status:              --- 
Final Accepted Text:        See
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=696#c5850. 
Resolution:                 Accepted As Marked
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2013-05-14 17:32 UTC
Last Modified:              2022-06-30 14:11 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    either NAME_MAX shouldn't be optional, or
readdir_r() needs clarification
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0000697 Adding of a getdirentries() function
has duplicate       0000831 How to allocate memory for readdir_r is...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0005877) geoffclare (manager) - 2022-06-30 14:11
 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=696#c5877 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
When applying this bug I realised that all references to readdir_r() on the
readdir() page need OB shading, not just the SYNOPSIS. I also added the
usual FUTURE DIRECTIONS text for OB functions saying readdir_r() may be
removed in a future version. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2013-05-14 17:32 philip-guentherNew Issue                                    
2013-05-14 17:32 philip-guentherName                      => Philip Guenther 
2013-05-14 17:32 philip-guentherOrganization              => OpenBSD         
2013-05-14 17:32 philip-guentherSection                   => <limits.h>      
2013-05-14 17:32 philip-guentherPage Number               => 273             
2013-05-14 17:32 philip-guentherLine Number               => 8986-8990       
2013-05-14 18:03 wlerch         Note Added: 0001604                          
2013-05-14 18:57 philip-guentherNote Added: 0001605                          
2013-05-15 16:17 dalias         Note Added: 0001606                          
2013-05-30 15:37 eblake         Relationship added       related to 0000697  
2013-05-31 09:08 david-bartley  Note Added: 0001632                          
2013-05-31 09:46 geoffclare     Note Added: 0001633                          
2013-05-31 09:53 geoffclare     Note Edited: 0001633                         
2013-05-31 11:56 dalias         Note Added: 0001634                          
2013-08-05 02:37 shware_systems Note Added: 0001697                          
2013-08-05 02:46 shware_systems Note Edited: 0001697                         
2013-08-05 04:00 dalias         Note Added: 0001698                          
2013-08-06 11:23 shware_systems Note Added: 0001700                          
2013-08-06 11:30 shware_systems Note Edited: 0001700                         
2013-08-06 11:37 shware_systems Note Edited: 0001700                         
2013-08-06 18:55 shware_systems Note Added: 0001701                          
2013-08-06 21:26 dalias         Note Added: 0001702                          
2013-08-08 07:45 Don Cragun     Tag Attached: issue8                         
2013-08-08 07:45 Don Cragun     Tag Detached: issue8                         
2014-03-29 23:32 eblake         Relationship added       has duplicate 0000831
2014-03-30 00:33 sstewartgallus Issue Monitored: sstewartgallus                 
  
2015-10-02 12:51 Florian Weimer Note Added: 0002854                          
2015-10-02 12:51 Florian Weimer Issue Monitored: Florian Weimer                 
  
2015-10-04 01:01 shware_systems Note Added: 0002857                          
2015-10-04 01:02 shware_systems Note Edited: 0002857                         
2022-06-16 16:00 Don Cragun     Note Added: 0005850                          
2022-06-16 16:01 Don Cragun     Interp Status             => ---             
2022-06-16 16:01 Don Cragun     Final Accepted Text       => See
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=696#c5850.
2022-06-16 16:01 Don Cragun     Status                   New => Resolved     
2022-06-16 16:01 Don Cragun     Resolution               Open => Accepted As
Marked
2022-06-16 16:01 Don Cragun     Tag Attached: issue8                         
2022-06-30 14:11 geoffclare     Note Added: 0005877                          
2022-06-30 14:11 geoffclare     Status                   Resolved => Applied 
======================================================================


  • [1003.1(2013... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to