auth48archive  

Messages by Date

• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Greg White via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Greg White via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] [IANA #1451504] [IANA] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9944 <draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18> for your review Amanda Baber via RT via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Alan DeKok via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-iab-agews-report-03> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-iab-agews-report-03> Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9969 <draft-iab-ai-control-report-02> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-iab-agews-report-03> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-iab-agews-report-03> Mark Nottingham via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-iab-agews-report-03> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-barnes-sframe-iana-256-06> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9969 <draft-iab-ai-control-report-02> for your review Mark Nottingham via auth48archive
• 2026/05/05 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9942 <draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-18> for your review Henk Birkholz via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Ruediger.Geib--- via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Ruediger.Geib--- via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9974 <draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements-21> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9974 <draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements-21> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Shay Gueron via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-barnes-sframe-iana-256-06> Aron Rosenberg via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Greg White via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Greg White via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-barnes-sframe-iana-256-06> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9964 <draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-11> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9942 <draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-18> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn-07> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9969 <draft-iab-ai-control-report-02> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9955 <draft-ietf-pquip-hybrid-signature-spectrums-07> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9959 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24> for your review Kaelin Foody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Greg White via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn-07> Martin Duke via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] [IANA] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9944 <draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18> for your review Kaelin Foody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9944 <draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18> for your review Deb Cooley via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9944 <draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18> for your review Eliot Lear via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9944 <draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18> for your review Muhammad Shahzad via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9944 <draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18> for your review Kaelin Foody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn-07> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-oauth-rfc7523bis-11> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/05/04 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9944 <draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18> for your review Eliot Lear via auth48archive
• 2026/05/03 [auth48] Re: questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9967 <draft-ietf-scim-events-16> for your review Phillip Hunt via auth48archive
• 2026/05/03 [auth48] Re: questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9967 <draft-ietf-scim-events-16> for your review Phillip Hunt via auth48archive
• 2026/05/03 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9969 <draft-iab-ai-control-report-02> for your review Mark Nottingham via auth48archive
• 2026/05/02 [auth48] Re: [C557] Cluster-Wide AUTH48 Questions: draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-18 (RFC-to-be 9942) and draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-22 (RFC-to-be 9943) Orie via auth48archive
• 2026/05/02 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2026/05/02 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Bob Briscoe via auth48archive
• 2026/05/02 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Bob Briscoe via auth48archive
• 2026/05/02 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/02 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Wes Hardaker via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: [C557] Cluster-Wide AUTH48 Questions: draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-18 (RFC-to-be 9942) and draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-22 (RFC-to-be 9943) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Greg White via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9967 <draft-ietf-scim-events-16> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9967 <draft-ietf-scim-events-16> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Greg White via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9970 <draft-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update-07> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9970 <draft-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update-07> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9958 <draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-14> for your review Mike Ounsworth via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Mike Ounsworth via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Wes Hardaker via auth48archive
• 2026/05/01 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9959 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24> for your review Emile via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Peter Yee via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9969 <draft-iab-ai-control-report-02> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9969 <draft-iab-ai-control-report-02> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: [C557] Cluster-Wide AUTH48 Questions: draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-18 (RFC-to-be 9942) and draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-22 (RFC-to-be 9943) Orie via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9942 <draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-18> for your review Orie via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9964 <draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-11> for your review Orie via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9959 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24> for your review Kaelin Foody via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9888 <draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-08> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-09> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4-11> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-teep-protocol-26> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-09> linchangwang via auth48archive
• 2026/04/30 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4-11> Sasha Romijn via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-teep-protocol-26> Hannes Tschofenig via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9968 <draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: [ISE] questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: [ISE] questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: [ISE] questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review Dino Farinacci via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: [ISE] Re: questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: [ISE] questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: [ISE] questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review Dino Farinacci via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Dan Voyer (davoyer) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] [ISE] Re: questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Zafar Ali (zali) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9959 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24> for your review Gorry Fairhurst via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9959 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24> for your review Kaelin Foody via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9959 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24> for your review Gorry Fairhurst via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-09> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9959 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24> for your review Kaelin Foody via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review Alan DeKok via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9959 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24> for your review Gorry Fairhurst via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Gorry Fairhurst via auth48archive
• 2026/04/29 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Thomas Fossati via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Mike Ounsworth via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Mike Ounsworth via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Mike Ounsworth via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Mike Ounsworth via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-quic-multipath-21> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-profiles-14> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-profiles-14> Robert Stepanek via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-profiles-14> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/28 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-quic-multipath-21> Mirja Kuehlewind via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9966 <draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-11> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9966 <draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-11> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review Dino Farinacci via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review Dino Farinacci via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Dan Voyer (davoyer) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] questions - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9962 <draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9964 <draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-11> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9964 <draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-11> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Anuj Budhiraja (abudhira) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Dan Voyer (davoyer) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9958 <draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-14> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9958 <draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-14> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Ruediger.Geib--- via auth48archive
• 2026/04/27 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Thomas Fossati via auth48archive
• 2026/04/26 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9944 <draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18> for your review Eliot Lear via auth48archive
• 2026/04/26 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Mike Ounsworth via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9963 <draft-ietf-tls-tls13-pkcs1-07> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9973 <draft-ietf-tls-8773bis-13> for your review Deb Cooley via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9973 <draft-ietf-tls-8773bis-13> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Douglas Stebila via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Anuj Budhiraja (abudhira) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Sean Turner via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9961 <draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9960 <draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Douglas Stebila via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9846 <draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis-14> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Douglas Stebila via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Sean Turner via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9973 <draft-ietf-tls-8773bis-13> for your review Russ Housley via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9954 <draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9959 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24> for your review Gorry Fairhurst via auth48archive
• 2026/04/24 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-profiles-14> Robert Stepanek via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Mike Ounsworth via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] [AD] [C557] Cluster-Wide AUTH48 Questions: draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-18 (RFC-to-be 9942) and draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-22 (RFC-to-be 9943) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Bob Briscoe via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-profiles-14> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-19> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4-11> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9957 <draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: [EXTERNAL] [AD] [C557] Cluster-Wide AUTH48 Questions: draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-18 (RFC-to-be 9942) and draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-22 (RFC-to-be 9943) Henk Birkholz via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription-17> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9768 <draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-34> for your review Bob Briscoe via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review Ruediger.Geib--- via auth48archive
• 2026/04/23 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9944 <draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18> for your review Deb Cooley via auth48archive

• Earlier messages