[rfced] Thank you for pointing this out (and apologies for missing this 
earlier). We have updated the Security Considerations section to match what 
appears in 8407bis [1].

Additionally, please note that we have removed the following text from the 
Security Considerations to match 8407bis. If this text should be re-added to 
the paragraph (or if there are any further updates needed), please let us know.
[JMC] You know, I don’t think it’s needed in light of the boilerplate text 
indicating an impact to operations if these data nodes are not protected.  I’m 
good with the sec considerations as they read now.
Joe
-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to