Hi Authors and Erik (AD)*, *Erik (AD) - This is another friendly reminder that we are awaiting your review and approval regarding the BCP 14 key word update from “MUST not” to “MUST NOT” in the sentence below:
Original: In particular, enabling or disabling the P flag MUST not trigger automatic changes in the A flag value set by the router. Current: In particular, enabling or disabling the P flag MUST NOT trigger automatic changes in the A flag value set by the router. See this diff file: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-auth48diff.html Additionally, we are still awaiting word regarding this query: >> 6) <!-- [rfced] *AD and authors - There is an open erratum report against RFC >> 4861 regarding the text that is being updated in Section 9.1 of this >> document. Are any updates needed? >> >> See https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8055. >> --> > > There is no conflict in spirit between the filed erratum and this > document. But if the erratum is approved then the text of this > document should be updated to reflect the erratum, and say: > “Note: If none of the M, O, or P (draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag) flags are > set, this indicates that no information is available via DHCPv6 from > the router, or from other nodes that the router has been made aware > of". > > With my 6MAN chair hat on: let the chairs discuss it with the AD. I > think it would be better if the decision for the erratum is made > before this draft is published. Authors - We will await any further updates you may have as well as approvals from each party listed on the AUTH48 status page below prior to moving this document forward in the publication process. The files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.xml The relevant diff files are posted here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes) Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9762 Thank you, RFC Editor/ap > On Apr 25, 2025, at 9:54 AM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > Hi Authors and Erik (AD)*, > > *Erik (AD) - This is a friendly reminder that we are awaiting your review and > approval regarding the BCP 14 key word update from “MUST not” to “MUST NOT” > in the sentence below: > > Original: > In particular, enabling or disabling the P flag MUST not trigger > automatic changes in the A flag value set by the router. > > Current: > In particular, enabling or disabling the P flag MUST NOT trigger > automatic changes in the A flag value set by the router. > > See this diff file: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-auth48diff.html > > Additionally, we are still awaiting word regarding this query: >>> 6) <!-- [rfced] *AD and authors - There is an open erratum report against >>> RFC >>> 4861 regarding the text that is being updated in Section 9.1 of this >>> document. Are any updates needed? >>> >>> See https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8055. >>> --> >> >> There is no conflict in spirit between the filed erratum and this >> document. But if the erratum is approved then the text of this >> document should be updated to reflect the erratum, and say: >> “Note: If none of the M, O, or P (draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag) flags are >> set, this indicates that no information is available via DHCPv6 from >> the router, or from other nodes that the router has been made aware >> of". >> >> With my 6MAN chair hat on: let the chairs discuss it with the AD. I >> think it would be better if the decision for the erratum is made >> before this draft is published. > > > Authors - We will await any further changes you may have and approvals from > each author and the *AD prior to moving forward in the publication process. > > The files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.xml > > The relevant diff files are posted here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-diff.html (comprehensive diff) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 > changes) > > Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9762 > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/ap -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
