Hi Bernie, This is a friendly reminder that we are awaiting your approval for this document.
Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9788 — FILES (please refresh) — The files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.pdf The relevant diff files have been posted here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-lastdiff.html (last version to this one) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this) Thank you, RFC Editor/ap > On Jul 2, 2025, at 5:19 AM, Bernie Hoeneisen <ber...@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> wrote: > > FYI: still working on it. > > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025, Alanna Paloma wrote: > >> Hi Authors, >> >> We have noted DKG’s approval on the AUTH48 status page: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9788 >> >> We will await approvals from Bernie and Alexey prior to moving this document >> forward in the publication process. >> >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.pdf >> >> The relevant diff files have been posted here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-diff.html (comprehensive diff) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 >> changes side by side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-lastdiff.html (last version to >> this one) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between >> last version and this) >> >> Thank you, >> RFC Editor/ap >> >>> On Jun 17, 2025, at 5:59 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alanna-- >>> >>> On Tue 2025-06-17 16:04:10 -0700, Alanna Paloma wrote: >>> >>>> Here is a more detailed definition of ascii-art at >>>> <https://authors.ietf.org/diagrams>: >>>> >>>> 1. ASCII-art. This artwork uses unicode characters rendered in a >>>> fixed-width font to >>>> produce a diagram. Any unicode character can be used, but the width >>>> should be >>>> less than 72 otherwise it cuts off in plaintext renderings. >>> >>> Thanks for the pointer to this! Perhaps it should include some >>> additional notes about "half-width vs. full-width", as some unicode >>> characters are designed to take up two columns in a fixed-width >>> terminal. >>> >>>> We have updated the MIME tree structures and text-based sample UI >>>> renderings in this document and RFC-to-be 9787 to have type=“ascii-art”. >>> >>> Thank you, this looks good to me. I hereby sign off on RFC-to-be 9788. >>> >>> I really appreciate your attention to detail. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> --dkg >> -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
