Hi all,

The below sounds good to me.

Best,
Peter

On 9/8/25 10:21, Johan Stenstam wrote:
One more nit, section 4.2.2:

In your question 8, the section called “Current C” (which is from section 4.2.2 
in the draft) I noted the term “sidecar”. This terminology has been 
discontinued (as it was confusing) and I therefore suggest the following change:

OLD:
   This
   opens up the possibility of having an arbitrary party (e.g., a side-
   car service) send the notifications, enabling this functionality even
   before the emergence of native support in nameserver software.

NEW:
   This
   opens up the possibility of having an arbitrary party (e.g., a service
   separate from a nameserver) send the notifications, enabling this 
functionality even
   before the emergence of native support in nameserver software.

Regards,
Johan Stenstam
Swedish Internet Foundation


--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to