Authors,
While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary)
the following questions, which are also in the source file.
1) <!--[rfced] We note that this document uses terms such as "PCEP Peer",
"TE Tunnel", and "SR Policy" with the second word capitalized. If
the intention is to use these terms with a specific meaning, would
you like to add a sentence stating where to find that definition?
For example:
Perhaps:
This document uses the following terms:
PCEP Peer as defined in [RFC5440]
SR Policy as defined in [RFC8402]
-->
2) <!-- [rfced] In many RFCs, the text following a TLV diagram is a definition
list rather than a paragraph. Would you like to update this as follows?
Current:
Type has the value 67. Length carries a value of 4. The "color"
field is 4 bytes long and carries the actual color value (specified
as an unsigned integer). A color value of zero is allowed.
Perhaps:
Type: 67
Length: 4
Color: 4-byte field that carries the actual color value (specified
as an unsigned integer). A value of zero is allowed.
-->
3) <!-- [rfced] Throughout the text, the following terminology appears to be
used
inconsistently. Please review these occurrences and let us know if/how they
may be made consistent.
COLOR TLV vs. Color TLV
OPEN vs. open (one instance of each)
TE Tunnel vs. TE tunnel
SR Policy vs. SR policy
-->
4) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online
Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language>
and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of this nature typically
result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers.
Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but this should
still be reviewed as a best practice.
-->
Thank you.
Sarah Tarrant and Alice Russo
RFC Production Center
On Sep 18, 2025, [email protected] wrote:
*****IMPORTANT*****
Updated 2025/09/18
RFC Author(s):
--------------
Instructions for Completing AUTH48
Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been reviewed and
approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.
If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies
available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties
(e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing
your approval.
Planning your review
---------------------
Please review the following aspects of your document:
* RFC Editor questions
Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor
that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as
follows:
<!-- [rfced] ... -->
These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
* Changes submitted by coauthors
Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
coauthors. We assume that if you do not speak up that you
agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
* Content
Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot
change once the RFC is published. Please pay particular attention to:
- IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
- contact information
- references
* Copyright notices and legends
Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
(TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
* Semantic markup
Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of
content are correctly tagged. For example, ensure that <sourcecode>
and <artwork> are set correctly. See details at
<https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
* Formatted output
Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the
formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is
reasonable. Please note that the TXT will have formatting
limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
Submitting changes
------------------
To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all
the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties
include:
* your coauthors
* [email protected] (the RPC team)
* other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,
IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the
responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
* [email protected], which is a new archival mailing list
to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion
list:
* More info:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
* The archive itself:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
* Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out
of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you
have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded,
[email protected] will be re-added to the CC list and
its addition will be noted at the top of the message.
You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
An update to the provided XML file
— OR —
An explicit list of changes in this format
Section # (or indicate Global)
OLD:
old text
NEW:
new text
You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit
list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text,
and technical changes. Information about stream managers can be found in
the FAQ. Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
Approving for publication
--------------------------
To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
that you approve this RFC for publication. Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
Files
-----
The files are available here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9863.xml
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9863.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9863.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9863.txt
Diff file of the text:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9863-diff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9863-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
Diff of the XML:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9863-xmldiff1.html
Tracking progress
-----------------
The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9863
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Thank you for your cooperation,
RFC Editor
--------------------------------------
RFC9863 (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-12)
Title : Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Color
Author(s) : B. Rajagopalan, V. Beeram, S. Peng, M. Koldychev, G. Mishra
WG Chair(s) : Julien Meuric, Dhruv Dhody
Area Director(s) : Jim Guichard, Ketan Talaulikar, Gunter Van de Velde
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
