Authors, We realize the content of RFC-to-be 9896 has been approved; my apologies, as here's a usage question that has arisen late in the process -- please consider whether "SVGs" (plural acronym) may be updated. More detail: "SVGs" is not used in W3C documents (e.g., https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/intro.html). Some may consider "SVGs" similar to using a file extension in plural like "JPGs" and "PNGs". However, it reads oddly. We note the expansion has an 's' (in 'Graphics'), while the acronym remains "SVG". We propose changing each instance of "SVGs", where the update was applied based on the intended meaning: A) SVG the language --> "SVG" B) SVG images --> "SVG drawings"
Please review and let us know if you prefer to leave the document as is or make updates as shown in this diff file (or otherwise): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896_proposed.html Thank you. Alice Russo RFC Production Center -- Current files: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-rfcdiff.html (all changes from approved I-D) -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
