Hi Rebecca, On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 at 02:12, Rebecca VanRheenen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for the quick reply! All of our questions have now been addressed. > We’ll leave the current references to [RFC8446] and [RFC8447] as is. > > Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make > changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further > updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will > await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the publication > process.
I have re-read the document and am happy to approve it. The only nit I fnoud is in §7.2: "[...] when RRC in DTLS 1.2 is used", which sounds slightly odd to my non-native ears. Wouldn't it be more natural to say "[...] when RRC is used in DTLS 1.2"? Anyway, not a big deal... I'll defer to your superior understanding of the nuances of the English language :-) cheers, t -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
