On Thursday, April 28, 2011, Martin Fox <[email protected]> wrote: >> AFAIK, no one else has said they plan to work on it, other than what I >> did on Chapter 1. > Then shall I look at it with respect to 3.4?
I'd like to see a full set of 3.3 books published for both OOo and LO, but with so few people to work on them, that may not be practical. The Draw Guide has skipped some releases so i guess it doesn't matter if it does so again. Up to you really. > And which version do you suggest I use, LO or OOo? I would need to check > the changelogs of both to see where they differ. Again, up to you. If you're going to do 3.4, you certainly could do it for LO. The LO book can then be modified for OOo, instead of the other way around. Or if you'd prefer to stay with OOo, that would work too. At this point I don't have a preference, and as you know if I did have a preference I would not hesitate to say so! > > Was the "42" suffix carefully chosen (HHGTTG as in)? Yes. ;-) > Are you going to migrate across to the "other" side? If so I wonder about > the future of the "cats" here, probably many (at least me) feel more > comfortable in this "environment" than the one which seems to exist over > there. I'm still not sure where I'll be putting most of my effort, mainly because we don't know yet what's going to happen between OOo & LO. I'll be writing a separate note on this topic to this list soon. By "this environment" do you mean OOo, or the authors/dev lists at OOo, or the ODFAuthors website, or some combination? I'm sure we can work something out so the main contributors are comfortable and productive to the benefit of the whole community (OOo & LO). Jean -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] For additional commands send email to [email protected] with Subject: help
