I know Daniel, thank you for you service... Please have a look at the new version of the What is OOo? chapter...let us know what you think...
BTW I do prefer the CC licenses to most any free documentation licensing, good choice. On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 20:26 -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote: > Hi Rick, > > Rick Barnes wrote: > > > The point of my post was that I returned to my PC after two days and had > > over 70 posts regarding the new licensing, and only a very few about > > work on the documents. > > I understand your frustration. I'm trying to make this as plainless for > your as possible. For example, I've spent a lot of time talking to Debian > legal and CC, so as to make the discussion here go smoothly. > > In the long run, this will make our lives easier (esp for our editors). > Since the new license requirements are easier to meet. > > Fortunately, the discussion is over and we're in the agreepment phase. > Soon this will all be over and you won't have to think aobut it again :-) > > Cheers, -- Regards, Rick Barnes www.nostabo.net ******************************************************************* PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL This electronic mail is solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you receive this electronic mail in error, please delete it from your system immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or using any of the contact details noted herein. This e-mail sent via Evolution 2.0.4 running on a Linux 2.6.11 kernel.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
