Daniel Carrera wrote:True, but they are published and not up for review. :(Peter Kupfer wrote:
I think I contributed to Using Mail Merge, but I could be wrong, I seem to remember editing a chapter about them.
I also believe I reviewed the charts and graphs & printing chapters of the Calc guide.
One way to solve the "I believe I reviewed xyz" problems is to review the chapter in question and then you'll be certain you reviewed it :-)
Cheers,
As I mentioned last month in another thread ("Revised Calc Outline is up for review"), "pre-published" docs are definitely open for revision. And all of the "published" draft chapters need at least a last review before final publication. Although it's the maintainer's responsibility to do a final check against the software, I'm sure I'm not the only person who would welcome someone else going over my chapters to see what else I have missed. The more eyes the better!
So as far as I'm concerned (wearing my managing editor's hat), if you want to review either of the Calc chapters you've mentioned, that would be a benefit. Once the draft PDFs go on the Docs website, I'm sure we'll get some feedback from the wider community too, which we'll need to take into consideration.
In a thread on Writer chapters, I said that major reorganisations should be avoided, but almost anything else goes. Which is not to say that all suggestions will (or should) be accepted at this point. What I'm doing with suggestions that are "too much" for right now, is keeping a file of them to consider when I next update a chapter (because of software updates, for example).
Cheers, Jean
