Ian Laurenson wrote: > Daniel, my interpretation of your reply is that you felt offended by my > comments about the Introduction to Styles document.
Oh, I'm sorry, no I wasn't offended. I'm sorry I gave that impression. I just thought that some of the things you suggested should wait while we work on other chapters. Because they would take some time and discussion to decide, and to get right. > I am, in fact, so impressed with this document I want to use it as the > basis for one of my presentations at LCA 2005 OpenOffice.org Miniconf. Oh, wow. I'm flattered. > The comments that I was making were changes that I wanted to make so > that I could do so, comfortably. Oh, I see. Please feel free to change the document. As I said earlier, I have too much on my plate, so I won't get to review the changes. But that shouldn't stop you from presenting an edited file. > Why choose an oooauthors document as the basis for a presentation? > Because it raises the profile of oooauthors and the way that we work as > a team to produce excellent documentation. Sounds great. > I have posted a suggested revised version of Introduction to Styles. The > file name is "DoingItWithStyle" as that is the name of my presentation > and so the name I gave my initial attempt, which I then merged back with > Introduction to Styles. As a consequence of this merging I haven't used > change revision. Good good. I wish I had time to look at it, but between homework, grading and exams, I really have to prioritize my OOoAuthors work. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org |
