On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 11:22 -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
Is this for Appendix C?
If yes, IMO, I don't think the function appendix needs an explanation
of what e is. Users who need to raise something to e will know.
Peter,
This is for Appendix B, Description of Functions (note the letter change).
I have had several comments about the wording regarding the constant "e" in the function descriptions for EXP, LN, IMLN and IMEXP. One refers to e as the Eulerian number and the others are even more vague. The online help is just as inconsistent, but does give you better information if you put all of the descriptions together.
I think adding a short definition of e won't hurt...
That's fine, it's your doc.
I just think it should be consistent through all the functions, so if that function is described, then they should all get some explanation and an example.
Maybe not, just one man's opinion.
Have a good one.
-- Peter Kupfer -- Using OOo since 'OO4 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to help? http://www.oooauthors.org For OOo tips: http://openoffice.peschtra.com/tips/ooo_tips_tricks.html To order OOo: http://openoffice.peschtra.com/distro/ooo_distro.html
