Tim Murray wrote:
Which chapters are these? Published ones? Or ones on the review list?
Which book?
They were
StylesReferenceV2_2May05_JHW.sxw
This one is a messy early draft which I haven't even pretended to put into
our styles. Best to ignore it at this stage
WorkWithStylesWriter_29May05_JHW.sxw
formatting_pages_27May05_JHW.sxw
Those two should have been in good shape, but it's true that I haven't
checked them carefully. It's good that you are doing so; they are at a
stage where that is worth doing. Feel free to fix them if you feel like it.
I won't mind! Saves me the work. :-)
PrintingWithWriter_07Apr05_JHW.sxw
This is a very early draft. Someone is working on that one, as it needs
more information added. It started out as some other document (probably a
chapter in one of my own books) and no attempt has yet been made to tidy up
the styles or anything else.
I then took a look at the five docs in the To Be Reviewed section.
Creating_Web_Pages was okay.
Good to hear. :-)
Upgrading uses a style for bullets, but is
different from the rest; numbers are done manually.
This is another chapter with a varied early history, which is still being
written. I'm not surprised that it is not the same as the others. It's on
my "must fix this eventually" list. You can have a go at it too, if you
want to.
Fontwork and
Fontwork started out as something else as well, and hasn't been gone
through to rationalise styles yet. It still needs more content review and
possibly some writing, but You can have a go at it too, if you want to.
Working_with_Styles both use manual styles.
I assume that Working_with_Styles isn't the actual file name; if it's on
the review list, it should be the one you noted above, which is
WorkWithStylesWriter_29May05_JHW.sxw.
In general, picking a file that is "visible" is not such a good idea, as
they are often early drafts or even superceded files.
Thanks for all of this work, Tim. You're spotting some definitely areas to
be fixed.
Cheers, Jean
