Hello Colin,
On Monday 08 August 2005 19:25, Colin J. Williams wrote:
> Many thanks for your response.

your welcome ... :)

> Thomas Hackert wrote:
> >On Sunday 07 August 2005 21:46, Colin J. Williams wrote:
<snip>
> >>When one exports to PDF a thirty page document is produced it
> >>looks good except that there are no links from the TOC to the
> >>body of the text - I'm not sure whether Adobe 7 has that
> >>capability.
> >
> >If you use File > Export to PDF, you should select "tagged PDF"
> > in the PDF Options-window (or something like that ... I am
> > using the German version of OOo here ... ;) ).
>
> In the English 1.9.122 there is no reference to tagged PDF in the
> File Menu.

I have left out a step here (thought, it was clear ...), sorry. At 
first you get the "Export"-dialog (is this the same in the English 
version of OOo?) and after inserting a name here and clicking on 
"Export..." you get the "PDF options" (or the like) ... And here is 
this "tagged PDF" in the German version. Sorry for the hassle ...

<snip>
>     Some tags that are exported are table of contents,
> hyperlinks, and controls.
>
> There are Export ... and Export to PDF entries in the menu.  The
> first provides two options:
>
>     i   Export to PDF
>     ii  Export to XHTML
>
> Neither behaves as expected.

See above. I missed the first step, sorry!

<snip>
> >>When one exports to XHTML one gets a 122KB file which Firefox
> >>does not undestand ( this is about one tenth the size of the
> >> PDF file).
> >
> >I think it is better to use "Save as" and to choose HTML as
> > format there. I have used it a couple of time and it seems to
> > be "valid" HTML ... ;)
>
> Save as works adequately.  The colon on the title page is wonky.
>
> When viewed by Firefox the image is wider than the screen and
> there is no horizontal scroll bar.

It would be interesting to see the HTML source code for that ... 
Alas I do not know enough HTML to help you on this, but maybe 
someone else ...
And maybe it is already reported in IssueZilla ... ;)

> Incidentally,
>     (a) Figure 7 has an inoccuous spelling error.  Tittle should
> be Title. (b) The W3C Validator reports 31 errors on the html

Wow ... That is too much, I think ... :( I have seen the validator 
report at the end of this mail, but I do not know how to fix it, 
sorry ... :(

<snip>

> >I do not know, how good the implementation of XHML in Firefox
> > is, it could be a bug ...
>
> Yes, it would be better left out until it is operational.

IIRC there was a thread in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] a couple of weeks ago 
about this. IIRC one of our members there has written an 
XSLT-script to convert the XHTML code to HTML (I do not find the 
mail at the moment, but I found another mail from this guy, where 
he mailed this link (maybe it is useful ... ;): 
http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/commandline.html. He (Christian 
Lohmaier) also mentioned this issue: 
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7809, but I have 
not looked at it yet, maybe it is not related to your problem ... :
(

<snip>
> >>When one sends to HTML one gets many files.  Aside from a wonky
> >>colon on the title page the rendering looks adequate.
> >
> >I have tried this with an document I am reading at the moment,
> > but I only get one document, so I cannot confirm this ... :(
> >What kind of document are you using?
>
> The document I was using was Daniel's draft on Styles.
> (0206WG-IntroductionToStyles, converted to odt)

This one I have not yet, but will get it later ... ;)

> >P.S.: Could you stop sending HTML mails, please, and also wrap
> > your lines after 68 or 72 characters, please?
>
> Sorry about that.  I've added OO Authors to my address book now,
> with a "Send Text" flag set.

Thanks a lot ... :)

> With Netscape, I used to be able to wrap text at say 68, I don't
> seem to be able to do this with
> Thunderbird.  The Thunderbird does wrap the incoming messages.

I cannot help you with that ... I have never ever used 
Thunderbird ... :(

> I have appended a copy of my original message,  as other isues
> are raised, and reduced the line
> length where necessary.

I think, that was not necessary, it is in the archive of this 
ML ... ;)
<snip old stuff and validator-report, because I cannot help you with 
that ... :( >

Have a nice day
Thomas.

-- 
The intelligence of any discussion diminishes with the square of the
number of participants.
                -- Adam Walinsky

Reply via email to