John Kane wrote:
Hi Jean,
I had a run through of the Working with Fields chapter and it looks good
to me but I am not an expert :(

Everything described seems to work okay and matches almost 100% against
2.0.0 RC 1.

Thanks, John, for the quick turnaround.

I've submitted it again for review, in the hope that someone else can find time to look at it too. It's good to have lots of input.

Some questions for reviewers, esp. "non experts", to consider are: does the info make sense to you? Is info left out that would help you understand it better? Are whole topics left out that you would like to see covered? I didn't attempt to cover everything in this chapter, but there might be something important to other people that I didn't think of because it's not a feature I use.

Cheers, Jean

Reply via email to