Hello Martin, *, On Thursday 03 November 2005 14:44, Martin Fox wrote: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 06:34:46 +0100 > Thomas Hackert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > as I am the translator of the "Getting Started with Impress", I > > have downloaded the latest version last Sunday. Now I have a > > question about it ... ;) > > The last version I have downloaded, was named > > 0109GS-GettingStartedWithImpress.odt. The new version I have > > downloaded on Sunday was named > > GettingStartedWithImpress_DL_24Oct05_JHW. I thought the latter > > was the name for the new GS dokumentation. Am I wrong here? TIA > > for your enlightenment > > Hoi Thomas > Perhaps Jean and Dan are tied up at present. The review system in > OOoauthors requires the reviewer, in this case obviously Jean, to > add her initials (JHW) and the date the file was last edited to > the basename of the file+initials of maintainer (Dan L), all > separated with _
this is something what I know already ... ;) > Perhaps the lack of the leading 0109GS- causes a little confusion > here? Yes! I thought the whole documentation is indexed somewhere and that the missing 01... will cause trouble later ... :( And I thought that they were different files until I compared them. > Note that any changes made by Jean should be able to be > seen by viewing changes (Edit > Changes > Show in the english > menu). This is also something I know ... ;) > see also: > > http://oooauthors.org/en/authors/userguide2/resources/naming_conv >entions I will have a look on it on Sunday ... ;) Thanks for the link and your answer! Have fun Thomas. -- If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker to come along would destroy civilization.
