Sak wrote:
Krishna Aradhi wrote:
- Can reviewers add whole sections to the document under review if they feel that the author of the document has missed out on explaining some feature? Or should the review merely insert a note into the document explaining what can be added to the document?

I'd say yes. There are a few areas of the manuals that haven't seen revision in some time, and so you're likely to encounter chapters that need an almost complete rewrite. I've rewritten entire sections in chapters, particularly during a major version release. When you upload it, the revisions can still be double checked and approved or sent back for further review, so it's better to go ahead and write the changes and go from there.

As Sak said, reviewers can add sections, but if you're unfamiliar with the other chapters in the book, or the contents of other books, you might ask first if a topic is covered elsewhere already. If the topic is already covered, perhaps it should be moved, or perhaps a brief mention with a cross-reference would be better.

- Can reviewers change the sequence of various sections in the document
under review? Or is inserting a note recommending which sections can be
rearranged enough?

For this I'd suggest discussing in a comment in the document or here on the mailing list. Rearranging a chapter can have far reaching indications, affecting indexes, tables of contents, etc. Don't hesitate to bring it up though. If you think a better arrangement would help the user understand the material more clearly, by all means, put it up for discussion.

Yes, reviewers can rearrange the sequence of sections in a chapter. I think this is less likely to need discussion here first. Several newcomers to the group have done major restructuring of some chapters recently, without prior discussion, and the results have been definite improvements.

Indexes and tables of contents fix themselves when they are updated, so that is not a consideration IMO.

However, what can be affected is similar chapters or sections in other books. For example, we try to keep all the introductory chapters at much the same level of detail, and all the chapters about printing or templates or customizing etc approximately the same (except for component-specific differences), and so on.

Really major changes (e.g., in the contents and sequencing of chapters in a book) may need to wait for another major release of the software. We made some big changes between OOo2.x and OOo3, after compiling quite a long wish list in the last year or so of OOo2.x.

--Jean

Reply via email to