* Akim Demaille wrote on Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:24:27PM CET:
> Le 22 mars 05, � 20:26, Paul Eggert a �crit :
>
> >+The auxiliary directory is commonly named @file{build-aux}.
> > If you need portability to @acronym{DOS} variants, do not name the
> > auxiliary directory @file{aux}. @xref{File System Conventions}.
> > @end defmac
> >
> Well, that's news to me, I never saw that name.
>
> It is also "commonly" named config/, but I guess commonness is in the
> eye of the beholder.
Me too. Where did the vote take place (I presume bug-gnulib), and why
did it not take place/was not announced on any autoconf lists?
lists.gnu.org does not show where the announcement _was_ crossposted to.
(No, I don't mind build-aux.)
Regards,
Ralf