Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hi,
Howdy!
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 06:21:48PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > m4_defun > m4_require Why do you use these and not AC_DEFUN and AC_REQUIRE? But I agree that these should be documented, for the non-Autoconf applications of m4sugar and m4sh.
In order to hide some of our internal macros from aclocal, they are
defined with m4_defun. m4_defun and AC_REQUIRE don't play together,
so we have to m4_require m4_defun'ed macros...
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
