Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + test -d "$at_suite_dir" &&
> + find "$at_suite_dir" -type l -prune -o -type d -exec chmod u+rwx \{\}
> \;
> rm -f -r "$at_suite_dir" "$at_suite_log"
Why do you need the "-type l -prune" here? Can't that be omitted?
"find" doesn't follow symlinks. (Ancient versions of "find" don't
understand either -type l or -prune.)
Similarly for the other uses of "find" and "rm".
Also, as a minor efficiency thing, if $at_suite_dir is not a directory
then you don't need to invoke rm at all; this really only applies to
the other uses, since the only thing they do is remove $at_group_dir.
