Paul Eggert wrote:
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
+[test -n "$at_traceon" && at_check_newline "AS_ESCAPE([$1], [`\"])"])])[]dnl
One minor thing: at_check_newline is trace-specific (it doesn't merely
check newlines; it does other stuff). So we might as well migrate the
"test -n" business into at_check_newline, no? It'll make the code
shorter and easier to read. And perhaps its name could be changed to
"at_check_traceable" or something like that.
I disagree because you can omit the test completely if the
nontraceability is determined at m4 time.
Anyway I have to rush so I'll commit tomorrow and wait for your opinion
if any.
Paolo
