Sure, why not. We do know that all seds print the second line with `sed 2q', no? (At least I don't know any other.)
Sure. GNU sed has "Q" that does not print it, but all seds do with "q". Paolo
Sure, why not. We do know that all seds print the second line with `sed 2q', no? (At least I don't know any other.)
Sure. GNU sed has "Q" that does not print it, but all seds do with "q". Paolo