> I'm going to sit on this patch a few more days before applying, unless I get > a > review.
I think you can push the first. Regarding the second, I have two ideas: 1) let's see if we can make the special case of requirements work. Can you send the non-working AS_ESCAPE patch? Maybe expanding once with diversion to -1 using m4_divert_require, and once with normal diversion since the requirements will have been output already. However that won't work with AS_REQUIRE. 2) but do we really need it? AS_ESCAPE is a macro that will usually be used only by Autoconf mavens... BTW, is there a way to kill a diversion without outputting anything? Maybe you can add that to m4sugar. Paolo
