-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 4/10/2009 2:50 PM: >>> are expected to be completely equivalent. >> Unfortunately, that expectation is wrong, because of the existence of >> AC_REQUIRE. At this point, I think the only thing I can do is add some >> documentation, in three places: > > Or even in four. Any comments on this proposed patch? Especially for the > 'Required Before Expanded' node - we want to make sure it reads easily > enough to point other users to that node when they encounter problems. I > stand by my ground that we really did fix an eight-year-old bug, but I am > also aware that we haven't heard the last from packages that happened to > be successfully exploiting the bug and which will need help in fixing > their code to be more robust.
I've pushed this patch. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake [email protected] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknkiEYACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBAlwCfYvDa66KqypyNNqlqW6XPBqxx 4zIAoIQuLh35zhsclITi9lpTH1WRHm/B =7q+y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
