Hi Paolo,
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:40:14AM CEST:
>
> > For example, you would use @code{AC_FC_SRCEXT(f90)} to employ the
> > -...@file{.f90} extension in future tests, and it would set a
> > +...@file{.f90} extension in future tests, and it would set an
> > @code{FCFLAGS_f90} output variable with any extra flags that are needed
>
> Same here, do you pronounce eff-cee-flags or Fortran-cee-flags?
Oh. That never occurred to me.
> I'd say "the" FCFLAGS_f90 output variable just to be sure.
Thanks, I've applied the patch below in your name to my repo,
but this time I'll wait at least a few hours before pushing it,
in case there are more comments. :-)
Cheers,
Ralf
2009-04-22 Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
manual: another grammar improvement.
* doc/autoconf.texi (Fortran Compiler): Avoid dependency on
pronunciation of `FCFLAGS_f90'.
diff --git a/doc/autoconf.texi b/doc/autoconf.texi
index 1256095..947998f 100644
--- a/doc/autoconf.texi
+++ b/doc/autoconf.texi
@@ -7555,7 +7555,7 @@ Fortran Compiler
(until @code{AC_FC_SRCEXT} is called again).
For example, you would use @code{AC_FC_SRCEXT(f90)} to employ the
-...@file{.f90} extension in future tests, and it would set an
+...@file{.f90} extension in future tests, and it would set the
@code{FCFLAGS_f90} output variable with any extra flags that are needed
to compile such files.
